#Best mac cleaner and virus protection pro

It didnвЂ™t matter that the old 30-pin adapter was, compared to Lightning, hideously ungainly, far too large, and technically outdated. When Lightning replaced the old 30-pin iPod connector, starting with the iPhone 5 in 2012, manyвЂ‰-вЂ‰IвЂ™d say mostвЂ‰-вЂ‰existing iPhone users were not happy about it. But, if the iPhones 13 had switched to USB-C, you know who would have complained? Hundreds of millions of existing iPhone users who have no interest in replacing the Lightning cables and docks they already own. Apple, to my eyes, has been managing this well. YouвЂ™ll note that in none of my reviews of iPad models that have switched from Lightning to USB-C in recent years have I complained about the switch. But I didnвЂ™t complain about them not switching, either. If the iPhones 13 had switched to USB-C, I wouldnвЂ™t have complained. To be clear, IвЂ™m neither pro-Lightning nor pro-USB-C. IвЂ™m not accusing Gartenberg of thisвЂ‰-вЂ‰though it is his piece with the sub-head claiming thereвЂ™s вЂњaвЂќ singular reasonвЂ‰-вЂ‰but many iPhones-should-definitely-use-USB-C proponents argue as though there are no good reasons for the iPhone to continue using Lightning. The pro-USB-C crowd, to me, often comes across as idealogical.

There are numerous reasons that the iPhones 13 still use LightningвЂ‰- and there are numerous reasons why switching to USB-C would make sense. Putting that in the singular does not justice to the complexity of such decisions. The sub-head on GartenbergвЂ™s piece is вЂњThe iPhone doesnвЂ™t have USB-C for a reasonвЂќ. вЂњ What makes sense for the goals of this product that we will ship in three years? And then the subsequent models for the years after that?вЂќ Those are the questions Apple product designers ask. My theory is that Apple carefully weighs the pros and cons for each port on each device it makes, and chooses the technologies for those ports that it thinks makes for the best product for the most people.

#Best mac cleaner and virus protection pro

How many normal people do you know who ever buy anything that plugs into a Lightning port other than a USB cable? And Apple doesnвЂ™t make more money selling their own (admittedly overpriced) Lightning cables to iPhone owners than they do selling their own (also overpriced) USB-C cables to iPad Pro and MacBook owners.

ItвЂ™s loose-change-under-the-couch-cushion revenue by AppleвЂ™s astonishingly high standards. But I donвЂ™t think thereвЂ™s serious money in that. And theyвЂ™re glad to have control over all iPhone peripherals. Apple is happy to keep the money it earns from MFi, of course. Gartenberg summarizes a commonly-held theory here: that Apple is sticking with its proprietary Lightning port on iPhones because they profit from MFi peripherals. And Apple takes a cut of every one of those IPhone and which companies get to make them.ДЄppleвЂ™s MFi program means that if you want to plug anything intoДЄn iPhone, be it charger or adapter or accessory, you have to go Over what kinds of hardware does (or doesnвЂ™t) get to exist for the The iPhone, Apple-made or notвЂ‰-вЂ‰along with the control it has It makes from every Lightning cable and accessory that works with It also means that Apple would lose out on the revenue More e-waste (if you buy AppleвЂ™s logic) or inconvenience itsД¬ustomers. Notably absent from AppleвЂ™s argument, though, is the fact thatД¬utting out a Lightning port on an iPhone wouldnвЂ™t just create Why Does the iPhone Still Use Lightning? Monday, 27 September 2021Д¬haim Gartenberg, writing for The Verge, вЂњ The Lightning Port IsnвЂ™t About Convenience ItвЂ™s About ControlвЂќ: